Working with gender diverse clients

Here, I address two recent studies dealing with gender diverse populations. First, Valentine, Smith, Miller, Hadden & Shipherd (2023) published “Considerations and Complexities of Accurate PTSD Assessment Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults” in Psychological Assessment. Here’s their abstract:

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessment among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults is complex because the literature offers little guidance on affirming assessment that accurately captures both trauma- and discrimination-related distress. This study aimed to characterize threats to precise PTSD assessment that arose during the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (CAPS-5). Our sample (N = 44) included trans women (38%), trans men (25%), nonbinary people (23%), and other TGD identities (14%). Participants were mostly White (75%), non-Latinx (82%), educated (91% at least some college), with a mean age of 37 years (SD = 15.5). Demographic and CAPS-5 scoring data as well as content analysis of audio-recorded CAPS-5 interviews are reported. All participants reported trauma exposure, and nearly half met PTSD diagnostic criteria (49%). Interpersonal assault was a common trauma type linked to posttraumatic symptoms (77%); 41% were sexual assaults; and 41% were discrimination-based (e.g., linked to gender identity) physical or sexual assaults. Qualitative findings suggest how and when discrimination-related experiences may threaten PTSD assessment accuracy, leading to overpathologizing or underdetection of symptoms, for example, (a) initial selection of a noncriterion A discrimination event as “worst event,” (b) linking symptoms to internalized transphobia (rather than trauma), and (c) linking victimization to gender identity/expression. Threats to PTSD assessment were more common when symptoms were linked to discrimination-based traumatic events, suggesting the importance of understanding contextual factors of index events. We offer a framework for understanding unique challenges to the assessment of PTSD among TGD people and provide recommendations for improving assessment.

This is an important study in addressing important needs for clarity in diagnosing PTSD in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) clients. The second study looks not at the client but at the macro-social context. Hollinsaid, Pachankis, Mair & Hatzenbuehler (2023) published “Incorporating Macro-Social Contexts into Emotion Research: Longitudinal associations between structural stigma and emotion processes among gay and bisexual men” in Emotion.  Here’s their abstract:

Research into correlates and predictors of emotion regulation has focused almost exclusively on individual differences and the immediate situation. Here, we consider whether features of macro-social contexts may also shape emotion regulation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a longitudinal study of 502 gay and bisexual men living in 269 U.S. counties that varied in the level of stigma surrounding sexual minorities. We find that gay and bisexual men living in higher- (vs. lower-) stigma counties consistently reported more suppression, which consequently explained longitudinal increases (vs. decreases) in their lack of emotional clarity over 24 months. Results were robust to demographic characteristics, stigma at the interpersonal level (i.e., sexual orientation-related discrimination), and another form of social inequality (i.e., county-level income inequality). These findings suggest that broadening the lens of emotion regulation research to include characteristics of the macro-social environment may yield new insights into determinants of emotion regulation. 

This is a much larger sample than in the first study. I like the fact that they identify stigma surrounding sexual minorities as a factor in emotion suppression and in lack of emotional clarity over time. Taken together, the studies highlight the importance of understanding the context in which gender diverse clients function and the challenges professionals face in understanding the trauma they have experienced.